My IVF Cycle Failed – What Went Wrong? Question #7: Am I Too Old?
702-892-9696
Fax:
702-892-9666
This is the seventh in a series of responses to common questions about Failed IVF Treatment.
There is little doubt that age is a very important determinant of IVF outcome.This is mainly because of the fact that a woman’s eggs undergo deterioration in quality as her age advances through and beyond her mid 30’s.Remember, eggs have been in the woman’s ovaries ever since she was incubating in her mother’s uterus.Thus, after a certain period of time – when she reaches her mid 30’s – a wear and tear effect increases the likelihood of chromosomal abnormalities that become unmasked with the maturation process.This maturation occurs with the LH surge that precedes normal ovulation or with the administration of hCG to induce ovulation.
In this regard, it is important to recognize that it is predominantly the egg (and not the sperm) that determines the chromosomal integrity (karyotype) of the embryo.An embryo with an irregular number of chromosomes (aneuploid) is incapable of propagating a normal baby.In fact, aneuploid eggs often fail to fertilize.Those that do either fail to divide normally or will implant defectively, resulting in an early pregnancy loss.In some cases the embryo might well attach and develop into a baby with a severe chromosomal abnormality.Such gestations often don’t survive until birth, but in some cases (such as with Down’s Syndrome) they survive through birth and beyond, albeit with a physical and/or mental handicap.
Here are a few general statistics that should help you understand the impact of age on embryo “competence” (the ability of the embryo to propagate a healthy pregnancy).Up until the early 30’s about 3 in 5 eggs and embryos (60%) are aneuploid.At 35-39 about 75-80% are aneuploid, and by age 40, 80-85% are chromosomally abnormal.By the mid 40’s, about 90% of eggs/embryos are aneuploid.To make matters worse, as the woman ages beyond 35, she gets ever closer to the menopause, and the number of eggs that become available for harvesting in IVF declines progressively.Thus, with a greater percentage of embryos being aneuploid (“incompetent”) and fewer embryos available, it should come as no surprise that IVF success rates decline progressively with advancing age beyond the mid 30’s, and then quite precipitously in the mid 40’s.
There is another point worth emphasizing and that is that an embryo that is numerically, chromosomally normal (euploid) has an excellent chance of propagating a viable pregnancy regardless of the age of the woman from whose ovary it was harvested.This means that the mechanism whereby advancing age progressively reduces the likelihood of a successful IVF pregnancy is the result of the declining potential in older woman to propagate euploid eggs rather than through progressive decline in the overall quality of all her eggs.
Aside from egg/embryo competency, there is also the fact that as women get older the incidence of reproductive disease such as uterine fibroids and adenomyosis also increase in frequency, and these can impact adversely on embryo implantation potential as well as the ability to achieve a full term delivery.
So, what can be done to offset some of the above inevitabilities?
First, it is important to counsel patients on the inevitable consequences of purposefully delaying treatment of infertility.I always counsel my older patients that the biological clock cannot be reset and that they should be both decisive and proactive when it comes to commencing IVF treatment.
Second, the protocol used for ovarian stimulation is also very important in the case of older women.This is because changes that take place in the ovary with advancing age render eggs much more vulnerable to Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) produced by the pituitary gland.Older women tend to experience a progressive overgrowth in the connective tissue surrounding their follicles (stroma or theca) that produce testosterone and other male hormones in response to LH.In addition, LH biologic activity increases with advancing age.Accordingly, there is a greater tendency for the older woman’s ovaries to produce excessive male hormones, which in turn can compromise egg development and increase the risk of egg/embryo aneuploidy.It is for this reason, in my opinion, that it is essential to avoid protocols of ovarian stimulation that will cause the woman’s ovaries to be overexposed to LH.That is why an individualized approach to ovarian stimulation is essential in older women (see a previous article posted on November 22 on this site).
Third, is the option of “embryo banking”.Here we attempt to arrest the biological clock by banking the older woman’s embryos over a number of consecutive cycles in order to increase the number of available embryos for transfer.Such embryo banking can be further embellished by testing each embryo for its chromosomal integrity using Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) and then stockpiling the normal embryos for subsequent transfer to the woman’s uterus.
With this in mind, older women as well as those who (regardless of age) have diminishing ovarian reserve are in ever increasing numbers seeking access to SIRM’s embryo banking program in the hope of so extending their reproductive potential.
Finally, for those women for whom the biological clock has run out, there is always the option of donor eggs. In my experience, this is an outstanding option through which couples can still experience all of the joy and happiness associated with family.
6 Responses to “My IVF Cycle Failed – What Went Wrong? Question #7: Am I Too Old?”
Leave a Reply
Top Search Terms for In Vitro Fertilization
- Embryo Quality & Embryo “Competence” – Part III – Testing the Seed
- Embryo Quality & Embryo “Competence” – Part One: Planting a Good Seed
- The Needle vs. the Dish: Should ICSI Be Used in All IVF?
- Embryo Implantation: What Farmers Can Teach us About Growing Healthy Babies
- Acupuncture and IVF: Does it Improve Success?
Ask Our DoctorsA Question












'There is another point worth emphasizing and that is that an embryo that is numerically, chromosomally normal (euploid) has an excellent chance of propagating a viable pregnancy regardless of the age of the woman from whose ovary it was harvested. This means that the mechanism whereby advancing age progressively reduces the likelihood of a successful IVF pregnancy is the result of the declining potential in older woman to propagate euploid eggs rather than through progressive decline in the overall quality of all her eggs.'
Dr Sher, I love reading your article! But need some explanation with re to the above. Do you mean older women surely still stand the chance of achieving a pregnancy with her own eggs, but the chance is just lower because the potential for her ovaries to produce euploid eggs is lower? So are you saying when a woman is older, it does not necessarily mean that ALL her eggs are aneuploid but that she would have a higher no of aneuploid eggs as opposed to euploid eggs? Thanks!
Your assumptions are quite correct!
Thanks!
Geoff Sher
Dear Dr Sher,
I am trying for baby #2. When I started trying I had just turned 38. I got pregnant the first month trying and lost the pregnancy at 6 weeks. The following two months I got pregnant again. I lost the second and third pregnancy at 5 and 4 weeks. All 3 were chemical miscarriages; no heartbeat seen. All conceptions were natural. After the third chemical miscarriage, which was 14 months ago I became infertile. I have been tested for RPL. I was referred to RE for ART and RPL. I have repeatedly high anticardiolipin IgM levels(45 and 40) and very high ANA. Due to my losses being early, RE doesn’t believe in ACA IGM impacting the pregnancies and offered IVF & CGH. I did an IVF with him but although FSH and AMH were normal my IVF got cancelled due to limited response (3-5 follicles growing). I have read the Alan Beer Center book and have discussed the immune testing with my RE but he strongly disagrees with the principal and insists on the CGH. I am now almost 40 years old and am wondering if I should push to see another RE and do the immune testing or focus on IVF & CGH. Appreciate your input.
I want to add that I have done the Yale endometrial function test and the result were normal. My husband’s sperm count is over the top in all tests and has only 17% DNA fragmentation.
I am not a bprotagonist of the endometrial function testing agenda.
Geoff Sher
I have absolutely no doubt that you need to be tested for an implantation dysfunction. It could well be immunologic but it does not seem to have been addressed. Please read the articles listed below. Aside from this, there is also little doubt that the biological clock is now a factor too….and perhaps CGH embryo testing and “banking” (see below) should also be consider before you run out of time.
Please go to the home page of this blog, http://www.IVFauthority.com . When you get there, look for a “search bar” in the upper right hand corner. Type the following subjects into the bar, click on it and it will take you to all the relevant articles posted there.
1. “An Individualized Approach to Ovarian stimulation” (posted on November 22nd, 2010)
2. “Ovarian Stimulation in IVF: Why is it important to down-regulate LH?”
3. “Agonist/Antagonist Conversion Protocol”
4. “Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction” (posted on May, 10th and on May 16th respectively.
5. “Embryo Implantation………” (Part-1 and Part- 2—-Posted August 2012)
6. “Traveling for IVF from Out of State/Country– The Process at SIRM-Las Vegas” (posted on March, 21st 2012)
7.“A personalized, stepwise approach to IVF at SIRM”; Parts 1 & 2 (posted March, 2012)
8. “IVF success: Factors that influence outcome”
9. “Staggered IVF”
10.“Embryo Banking”
11. “Egg Donation”
Consider calling 800-780-7437 or 702-699-7437 to arrange a Skype consultation (free of charge to those who reside in the United States or Canada) with me so we can discuss your case in detail
Geoff Sher