IVF: A Fresh Look at the Indications
702-892-9696
Fax:
702-892-9666
The idea behind in vitro fertilization (IVF) is that, by eliminating many of the barriers associated with conventional reproduction, the chance of having a baby is significantly improved. When performed in centers of excellence, IVF is now so successful that birth rates are more than double that achieved with “old-fashioned” procreation. In fact when performed in women under 35 who have normal ovarian reserve, a single attempt at IVF with the transfer of two advanced embryos (blastocysts) can yield a 40-50% live birth rate. And when sophisticated genetic embryo selection using (comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is employed to identify the most competent embryo(s), the transfer of a single chromosomally normal embryo yields a baby rate of >60%.
The science of assisted reproduction has advanced in leaps and bounds over the last 3 decades. The technique was originally developed for women with nonfunctioning fallopian tubes (tubal factor infertility). Until about 10 years ago, IVF was considered a procedure of last resort…the final common pathway through which pregnancy could be achieved when all else had failed. This is no longer the case. There have been major advances in the development of improved drugs, the evolution of customized and individualized protocols for ovarian stimulation, the introduction of advanced laboratory techniques such as those involving embryo culturing methods, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) enhanced egg/embryo freezing through vitrification, and most recently the introduction of CGH for improved egg and embryo selection. These have expanded the indications for IVF such that today it has become a first line of treatment for a variety of causes of infertility. Current indications for IVF include:
Male Infertility: IVF is the treatment of choice for moderate to severe male infertility. Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) with or without the use of fertility drugs is relatively non-efficacious when it comes to treating moderate and severe cases of male infertility. Although IVF has long been a treatment of choice for male infertility, it was not until the introduction in the 90’s of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), that IVF became almost as successful when applied in cases of male infertility as for female related causes. ICSI is a procedure where fertilization is achieved through the direct injection of one sperm into each egg,
Tubal Disease Due to Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) and/or Adhesions: In the early 90′s IVF birth rates began to improve to the point that tubal surgery for the treatment of infertility due to damaged or blocked fallopian tubes rapidly became obsolete. Sadly, and adding to the plight of many patients, there are still some physicians with a die-hard attitude who still recommend or perform tubal surgery for infertility due to tubal disease resulting from PID. IVF performed in an optimum setting offers more than double the birth rate following a single month of treatment than can be achieved within two to three years following surgery.
Endometriosis: Endometriosis, regardless of its severity, is associated with the presence of “toxins” in the pelvic secretions that surround the fallopian tubes (where the sperm lie waiting to fertilize the egg). Thus, whether fertility drugs are used (without IVF) or whether IUI is performed, the egg(s) will inevitably become exposed to “toxic” pelvic secretions as they enter the fallopian tube(s). Furthermore, surgery aimed at removing endometriotic deposits can never get rid of all of them, since for every one removed, there are probably many that are in the process of developing, and these also release the aforementioned “toxins.” Accordingly, such options are largely ineffective in the treatment of endometriosis-related infertility. Only IVF, where eggs are extracted from the ovary (ies) before they come in contact with pelvic secretions, bypasses this problem. Because of this important factor, IVF is the treatment of choice in cases of endometriosis.
Finally, about 30% of women with endometriosis have an immunologic implantation problem that is associated with increased endometrial natural killer cell activity (NKa). Unless this problem (if present) is treated appropriately with intralipid (IL) and/or intravenous gammaglobulin (IVIG) to down-regulate such NKa, the chance of successful pregnancy – even with IVF – is low.
Advanced Age: Even in IVF centers of excellence, IVF success rates begin to decline after a woman reaches 35 years of age. Thus, such infertile women desiring to have a baby using their own eggs need to be proactive. As an example, the birth rate (with own eggs), for women between 40 and 43 years, is 10% – 20% per cycle of treatment. Women over 35 years might also consider banking embryos (preferably blastocysts) that have been genetically screened through CGH for their “competence” and “stockpiling” them for future use…before they run out of time on the biological clock. And, for those women who are unable to produce good quality eggs, consideration should be given to using a young (less than 35 years of age) egg donor where the comparable birth rate per embryo transfer procedure can be expected to be above 50-60%.
Unexplained Infertility: Most cases of “unexplained infertility” are indeed explainable using a variety of testing. Some are due to undiagnosed early pelvic endometriosis (a laparoscopy is needed to identify this). Other cases may be due to a subtle hormonal dysfunction, antisperm antibodies, immunologic implantation dysfunction, etc. Regardless however, when there is no apparent cause for infertility and the woman is over 35 years of age and/or has failed to respond to other types of treatment, IVF becomes the treatment of choice.
Immunologic Infertility: Immunologic causes of infertility include: a) the presence of antisperm antibodies in the male or female partner and, b) immunologic implantation dysfunction (IID) where attachment of the embryo to the uterus is prevented or compromised. Thus IID presents as “unexplained” failure to conceive or as “unexplained” early pregnancy loss. About 20-30% of women undergoing IVF, especially those with repeated IVF failures or recurrent miscarriages and those with a personal (or family) history of autoimmune conditions (such as lupus erythematosis, hypothyroidism or rheumatoid arthritis) will be found to have IID, requiring immunomodulation if IVF is to succeed.
Intractable Uterine Factor:A variety of uterine factors can indicate IVF with a gestational surrogate as the best course of treatment. These include the following:
- Women who do not have a uterus (congenital or post-hysterectomy)
- Women with severe uterine pathology
- Women who in spite of aggressive treatment with estrogen and vaginal sildenafil (Viagra) are incapable of producing an adequate uterine lining that would support a viable pregnancy
- Some cases where there is an intractable aloimmune implantation dysfunction (e.g. an absolute DQa match between the male and female partner with NKa) will require a gestational carrier.
Today, due to a myriad of factors, IVF is regarded as one of the main thoroughfares for helping couples achieve the goal of creating a family. However, no two IVF candidates are exactly alike and there is no single approach that is applicable to every patient. In the final analysis, success requires a careful analysis of the variables known to affect outcome in combination with a very individualized and customized approach to treatment, judicious and selective application of available technology, with an ongoing emphasis on putting the needs of the patient at the forefront.
8 Responses to “IVF: A Fresh Look at the Indications”
Leave a Reply
Top Search Terms for In Vitro Fertilization
- Embryo Quality & Embryo “Competence” – Part III – Testing the Seed
- Embryo Quality & Embryo “Competence” – Part One: Planting a Good Seed
- The Needle vs. the Dish: Should ICSI Be Used in All IVF?
- Embryo Implantation: What Farmers Can Teach us About Growing Healthy Babies
- Acupuncture and IVF: Does it Improve Success?
Ask Our DoctorsA Question














Is immulogical infertility possible in cases of secondary infertility? My husband and I have been ttc our second child for almost 2 years. When we were trying for our first child, I fell pregnant for the first time within 3 months of trying, had a first miscarriage at 11 weeks, then fell pregnant a second time the first month of trying, had a second miscarriage at 8 weeks, then fell pregnant for a third time again the first month of trying, and gave birth to my daughter at full term. We have undergone the stardard fertility tests and apart from a slight male factor (sperm count very high, but motility at 45% and morphology at 7%), and possible short luteal phase (10 days), everything appears to be normal (i.e. is unexplained). So, about 6 months ago, we started some superovulation (Puregon)/IUI treatments and we've undergone 4 unsuccessful treatments so far. In all of the cycles, I responded to the Puregon very well and produced on average 3-4 good sized follicles. My husband's numbers after sperm wash were excellent as well. We will now be moving on to an IVF treatment next month. I asked my fertility doctor whether or not it would be worth doing some immunological tests, as this is one of the tests that was not completed. My doctor's response was that this would only be relevant in cases of miscarriage and, as I have not conceived, in his opinion this would not provide us with any more answers. Does this makes sense? Could it not be possible that I am not conceiving due to immune problems? Does the fact that I already had a child change anything? I am 35 years old and my husband is 40 yrs old. Many thanks!
Indeed yes! Especially balloimmune implantation dysfunction can and does occur in association with 2ndary reproductive failure. Read up on this elsewhere on this site and also read the article on Recurrent Pregnancy Loss!
Geoff Sher
I recently concluded my first IVF (unsuccessfully). I actually started my period while I was still using the crinone–4 days before I was scheduled for the beta. I do have stage 1 endometriosis and typically have a shorter luteal phase (10 days on average). Those are the only two factors that have been identified at this point. Would it be in my interest to request a test to rule out immunologic causes before we consider a 2nd attempt at IVF? My husband is unsure if he wants to try again considering the enormous price tag and lack of information as to why the first attempt was unsuccessful.
Might I respectfully suggest that we talk indepth before you proceed any further. Simply call 800-780-7437 to set up a free telephone conference with me.
Geoff Sher
Dr Sher,
I am grateful for the wealth of information you are providing, for its precision and the scientific approach.
Please advise on best course of action given the following:
I am 36 (this month), never miscarried – in fact I believe I never have been pregnant and only tried to get pregnant during the last 2 years – unsuccessfully apparently due to male infertility factor mainly.
My husband is 46, had a vasectomy 10 years ago, had it reversed 2 and a half years ago. It seemed successful for a window of 3 months or so (in which I didn’t get pregnant) after which scar tissue blocked the vas deferens connection so he has azoospermia now.
We started treatment for ICSI and all my tests bar one seem to indicate my reproductive apparatus is functioning normally. The exception is a repeated blood test to determine potential immunological issues at Chicago Labs indicating TNF (?) values above normal in nov 2012, normal-low in Jan 2013. A third test 2 weeks ago seems to show again high value for NK cells. I don’t know the crucial answer if it’s about high activity -NKa or just concentration.
I am prescribed for this corticosteroids +clexane+ aspirin. I read the very good articles on your site and know your position on immunologic infertility treatment and your results with something else- intrallipid. BUT you also wisely discuss the tailored approach to patient care.
With apologies for the many details, my fundamental question is: should I go for the suggested immune suppressant treatment or give my 36 years old healthy body a chance without the risks associated with steroids?
By the way, why aren’t these risks (for mother and child) discussed anywhere?
Thank you very much in advance and apologies for the long post,
Adele
It sounds as if you definitely have activated uterine natural killer cells (NKa). Steroid treatment(whether or not you get Clexane and aspirin) will not cut it as this alone will not down-regulate NKa. You are going to need a combination of Clexane intralipid, but the way in which this is done as well as the timing and dosage are all critical.
Please go to the home page of this blog, http://www.IVFauthority.com . When you get there, look for a “search bar” in the upper right hand corner. Type the following subjects into the bar, click on it and it will take you to all the relevant articles posted there.
1.”Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction” (posted on May, 10th and on May 16th respectively.
2. “Embryo Implantation………” (Part-1 and Part- 2—-Posted August 2012)
3. “Traveling for IVF from Out of State/Country– The Process at SIRM-Las Vegas” (posted on March, 21st 2012)
4.“A personalized, stepwise approach to IVF at SIRM”; Parts 1 & 2 (posted March, 2012)
5. “IVF success: Factors that influence outcome”
Consider calling 800-780-7437 or 702-699-7437 to arrange a Skype consultation (free of charge to those who reside in the United States or Canada) with me so we can discuss your case in detail
Geoff Sher
Thank you, Dr. Sher, for the clear and prompt answer.
I live in London, UK hence I might contact your clinic for a paid phone consultation.
Thanks again and all the best,
Adele
I look forward to a Skype consultation with you Adelle.
Geoff Sher