Embryo Splitting To Increase the Availability of “Competent” Embryos For IVF
702-892-9696
Fax:
702-892-9666
I recently received several inquiries from visitors to our SIRM discussion boards on the subject of “embryo splitting” to try and improve the opportunities to conceive through IVF. Here is one example of such an inquiry that recently appeared on the SIRM-Las Vegas regional discussion board:
“I’ve been reading on embryo splitting (for readers: manually splitting embryos in the lab …..in order to increase the number of embryos to transfer/freeze). The AMA seems to not have an issue with it and understands that it could help infertile couples increase their chances: (www.amassn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion2145.shtml)”
Against this background, I wish to share the article below with those of you that may be interested in this topic.
“Spontaneous embryo splitting resulting in monozygotic (“identical”) twinning is a well established peculiarity of nature”.
There exists a period during early mammalian embryo development when embryos can be separated purposely into halves or even quarters without drastically reducing the probability that each portion of an embryo is able to develop into a fetus. The usefulness of embryo sectioning is realized any time that the number of embryos suitable for transfer is limited.
Microsurgical Embryo Splitting (MES) might ideally be combined with full karyotyping (chromosomal recognition) using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on 6-9 cells, day 3 embryo(s) to identify “competent” embryos. This would be followed by MES on day 3 (the cleaved embryo stage of development), or on day 4 (the morula stage). The resulting hemi-embryos so produced would thereupon be cultured for a few days longer to the blastocyst stage when they would either be transferred fresh to the uterus or be vitrified (frozen) and banked for subsequent dispensation. In this manner MES might serve as a means to increase the number of available embryos per woman.Potential complications such as twin-to-twin transfusion, umbilical cord entanglement and obstructed birth, which often occur with natural spontaneous monozygotic twinning, are not encountered in MES-induced twinning. The explanation lies in the fact that unlike natural monozygotic twins that often occupy a single, common gestational sac and frequently share a common blood supply derived from a single placenta, MES-induced monozygotic twins invariably have their own placentas and reside in separate gestational sacs.
MES, should it become a feasible, acceptable and practicable clinical option in ART could by increasing the number of available viable embryos offer hope for thousands of women who because of advanced reproductive age and/or diminished ovarian reserve are only capable of producing very few “competent” eggs/embryos at a time. It might also prove to be of benefit in cases where (out of personal choice) IVF is performed without the use of fertility drugs (Natural Cycle IVF) and where accordingly only one or two eggs/embryos are generated. ———————————————————————-
Addendum: SIRM-Las Vegas is soon to launch a limited study to evaluate the efficacy of MES. Criteria for consideration of inclusion in this study will be as follows:
• Age less than 36 years • Regular menstruation/ovulation
Please email Tom Anderson (toma@sherinstitute.com) if you would like to be considered for inclusion in this proposed study.
4 Responses to “Embryo Splitting To Increase the Availability of “Competent” Embryos For IVF”
Leave a Reply
Top Search Terms for In Vitro Fertilization
- Embryo Quality & Embryo “Competence” – Part III – Testing the Seed
- Embryo Quality & Embryo “Competence” – Part One: Planting a Good Seed
- The Needle vs. the Dish: Should ICSI Be Used in All IVF?
- Embryo Implantation: What Farmers Can Teach us About Growing Healthy Babies
- Acupuncture and IVF: Does it Improve Success?
Ask Our DoctorsA Question














I am 27 and just found out my AMH is .87. Unfortunately my husband has a balanced translocation and we need to do PGD. When checked I had 8 eggs during my baseline sonogram. Is this technique something that would increase our chances of having enough embryos to biopsy?
No it would not…in my opinion.
Good luck!
Geoff Sher
Scientists at the Beijing Institute of Genomics have proposed a method to prevent significant Autism rate increase in the future
http://f1000.com/posters/browse/summary/1092806 based on time-separated twinning.
We have reported elsewhere on this blog o “Artificial twinning” by creating demi-embryos microsurgically. Whether time separated twinning will reduce the risk of Autism is purely speculative at this time.
Geoff Sher